Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:32

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is the most inappropriate experience you have had with a friend's daughter?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Do straight guys like to see cocks?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do I get stressed when I go to bed?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Channel Island pharmacists confirm digestion drug shortage - BBC
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump Media Gets Closer to Truth Social Bitcoin ETF Debut With SEC Filing - Decrypt
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.